Re: plpython implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From james
Subject Re: plpython implementation
Date
Msg-id 51D113BC.7000004@mansionfamily.plus.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpython implementation  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: plpython implementation
Re: plpython implementation
PL/Lua (was: plpython implementation)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
> In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
> have left it very clear they don't intend to "fix" that, as they don't
> consider it a bug. It's just how it is.
Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used outside
of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
'promoting' pllua?

My understanding is that it (lua) is much cleaner under the hood (than 
CPython).
Although I do recognise that Python as a whole has always had more traction.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython implementation