On 06/27/2013 12:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>> It could be pretty satisfactory to have a simple listing, in the
>>> release notes, of the set of reviewers. That's a lot less
>>> bookkeeping than tracking this for each and every change.
>> Adding the names to each release note item is not a problem; the
>> problem is the volume of names that overwhelms the release note text. If
>> we went that direction, I predict we would just remove _all_ names from
>> the release notes.
> Yeah. Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of the audience for
> the release notes doesn't actually give a darn who implemented what.
Maybe we should have a Kudos / Bragging rights wiki page, with a table
something like this:
Release Feature Name Principal Author(s) Contributing Author(s) Code Reviewer(s) Tester(s)
Constructing it going backwards would be an interesting task :-)
cheers
andrew
