On 06/24/2013 04:59 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:45:48PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I see value in making the codebase compileable with g++... and down the
>> track I can see being able to use basic class features as quite useful
>> given Pg's fairly OO internal design. Inline template functions instead
>> of macros would be nice. I've worked with C++ enough not to be overly
>> excited by the idea of going down the rabbit hole of Boost, complex
>> template arrangements, etc, and I don't love the STL ... but any
>> sensible project adopting C++ carefully picks and chooses what features
>> it uses and how.
>
> I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
> are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
> features not to use.
How is that different than us having to do the same with C?
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
