Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Law
Subject Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console
Date
Msg-id 51C834C0.7010200@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console
Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console
List pgsql-hackers
Hello Noah,

Thanks for your work, your patch is definitely better. I agree that this 
approach much more generic.
23.06.2013 20:53, Noah Misch wrote:
> The attached revision fixes all above points.  Would you look it over?  The
> area was painfully light on comments, so I added some.  I renamed
> pgwin32_toUTF16(), which ceases to be a good name now that it converts from
> message encoding, not database encoding.  GetPlatformEncoding() became unused,
> so I removed it.  (If we have cause reintroduce the exact same concept later,
> GetTTYEncoding() would name it more accurately.)
Yes, the patch works for me. I have just a little question about 
pgwin32_message_to_UTF16. Do we need to convert SQL_ASCII through UTF8 
or should SQL_ASCII be mapped to 20127 (US-ASCII (7-bit))?
> What should we do for the back branches, if anything?  Fixes for garbled
> display on consoles and event logs are fair to back-patch, but users might be
> accustomed to the present situation for SQL_ASCII databases.  Given the low
> incidence of complaints and the workaround of using logging_collector, I am
> inclined to put the whole thing in master only.
I thought that the change could be a first step to the PosgreSQL log 
encoding normalization. Today the log may contain messages with 
different encodings (we had a long discussion a year ago: 
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5007C399.6000405@gmail.com)
Now the new function GetMessageEncoding allows to convert all the 
messages consistently. If the future log encoding fix will be considered 
as important enough to be backported, then this patch should be 
backported too.

Thanks again!

Best regards,
Alexander




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze