> No. I think as long as we only have pglz and one new algorithm (even if
> that is lz4 instead of the current snappy) we should just always use the
> new algorithm. Unless I missed it nobody seemed to have voiced a
> contrary position?
> For testing/evaluation the guc seems to be sufficient.
Then it's not "pluggable", is it? It's "upgradable compression
support", if anything. Which is fine, but let's not confuse people.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
