Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work
Date
Msg-id 51B5F04D.1030708@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SPGist "triple parity" concept doesn't work
List pgsql-hackers
> That would work fine as long as the invariant is maintained accurately.
> However, there are at least two cases where the existing code fails to
> maintain the invariant:

Hmm. Didn't catch that during development.

> Thoughts?

Give me some time to play around it. Will think.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON and unicode surrogate pairs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)