Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date
Msg-id 51A4D3AF.9060708@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> This argument comes up every couple of years and the people that
>> are trying to solve the problem by changing the versioning are
>> ignoring the fact that there is no problem to solve.

We just had this discussion on -advocacy (where it belongs, frankly) a
couple months ago:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/512E8EF8.3000507@agliodbs.com

To sum up: the negatives of changing our version numbering scheme
outweighed the positives.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Extent Locks
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Extent Locks