Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Darren Duncan
Subject Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
Date
Msg-id 5180B466.6030307@darrenduncan.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?  (Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
You know what I think Postgres needs?  Its an official way to declare a
tablespace in a special way that marks the whole tablespace as being
temporary/volatile, so that whenever the server starts/recovers, it assumes this
tablespace doesn't exist or may not exist and can reinitialize it without
trouble.  There would also be restrictions then, that certain things may not be
declared in such a tablespace, such as anything but temporary tables, or maybe
some other things.  There is such a reasonable use case for this.  A feature for
9.4 perhaps? -- Darren Duncan



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Yang Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
Next
From: Yang Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?