Re: Analyzing bug 8049 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Analyzing bug 8049
Date
Msg-id 517ED6F1.7010302@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Analyzing bug 8049  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/28/13 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thoughts?  Anybody know of a counterexample to the idea that no plug-ins
> call query_planner()?

I would assume that anyone writing anything that calls such a low-level function reads -hackers regularly and would
easilybe able to handle whatever changes to their code that the new callback parameter required. We would obviously
wantto send notice about this ahead-of-time in addition to sticking something in the release notes.
 

That said, I'd be rather surprised if anything actually calls planner functions directly.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Graph datatype addition
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers