On 4/24/2013 1:39 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Currently the jdbc website requires working knowledge of forrest and
> seems to be a considerable barrier to entry to making changes.
>
> Just this week the ODBC guys changed their site to be a static site
> based on the main site's template
> http://psqlodbc.projects.pgfoundry.org I am proposing a similar
> solution. Dana has offered to take on the task of changing it over but
> understandably doesn't want to waste his time if it won't be used.
>
> thoughts ? constructive criticism ?
wouldn't a site based on a CMS that could be managed by multiple people
without direct file access make more sense? something blog or wiki
based, perhaps? sure, more effort up front to develop...
or is the community of "jdbc website contributors" so small that giving
them each ssh access to the entire site is acceptable ?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
