Re: serial drop error - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: serial drop error
Date
Msg-id 5153.1102359032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: serial drop error  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Responses Re: serial drop error  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> I can see the point of *not* dropping the sequence unless the
> owning column is dropped.  I just don't see the point of disabling the
> useful ability to decouple the sequence-column association, and dropping
> the default seems the most reasonable way to do that.

Where we part ways is on the claim that this is useful.  As I said
before, if you think they are independent objects then you should create
'em that way.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "invalid memory alloc request size " in deferred trigger causes transaction to fail, but the backend keeps running
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1292: ecpg precompile bug (valiable typedef & define )