On 3/24/13 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I also concur with the complaint here
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAZKuFZxyj-RT1aeC6s0g7zM68tDLfbBM1R6HGrbbxnz80KcoA@mail.gmail.com
> that allowing a minimum sleep of 0 is rather dangerous
The original "watch" command apparently silently corrects a delay of 0
to 0.1 seconds.
> Another minor question is whether we really need the time-of-day in the
> banner,
That's also part of the original "watch" and occasionally useful, I think.
