Re: Git conversion status - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Git conversion status
Date
Msg-id 5152.1285088137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Git conversion status  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 18:47, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> True. �We will be creating four or five tags at a time during
>> back-branch update cycles, but those might well arrive in separate
>> pushes anyway, depending on how Marc chooses to arrange his workflow.

> I could look into if it's possible to group the tags together if they
> come in a single push. I'm not entirely sure it's possible (I don't
> know if the commitmsg script gets called once in total or once for
> each), but I could look into it.

> However, I agree with Robert I doubt it's worth it.

Agreed.  It's definitely not something to spend time on before the
update workflow becomes clear --- the case may never arise anyway.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable snapshot isolation error logging