On 03/24/2013 05:08 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:52:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Over the weekend, KDE came within a gnat's eyelash of losing *all*
>> their authoritative git repos, despite having seemingly-extensive
>> redundancy. Read about it here:
>> http://jefferai.org/2013/03/24/too-perfect-a-mirror/
>>
>> We should think about protecting our own repo a bit better, especially
>> after the recent unpleasantness with a bogus forced update. The idea
>> of having clones that are deliberately a day or two behind seems
>> attractive ...
>
> I think the lesson here is that a mirror is not a backup. RAID, ZFS,
> and version control are all not backups.
>
> Taking a tarball of the entire repository and storing it on a different
> machine would solve just about any problem you can think of in this
> area.
fwiw - the sysadmin team has file-level backups of all pginfra hosts
(two backups/day, one per day for a week and a full per week for 4 weeks
of history).
Stefan
