在 2026/4/14 15:34, Lakshmi N 写道:
> Hi hackers,
>
> foreach_current_index returns a 0-based index so
> list_length also takes a 0-based index. Perhaps the
> check should be list_length(ind_oids_new) <= pos?
> Please find the attached patch.
>
> int pos = foreach_current_index(ind_old);
>
> if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos))
> elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short");
> ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos);
> break;
>
> Regards,
> Lakshmi
This fix looks correct to me. Both foreach_current_index(), so 0<=pos<list_length is expected.
Regard,
Xiaopeng Wang
