Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data
Date
Msg-id 5126.1507299731@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] On markers of changed data  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data
List pgsql-hackers
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> Is it safe to use file modification time to track that file were changes
> since previous backup?

I'd say no:

1. You don't know the granularity of the filesystem's timestamps, at least
not without making unportable assumptions.

2. There's no guarantee that the system clock can't be set backwards.

3. It's not uncommon for filesystems to have optimizations whereby they
skip or delay some updates of file mtimes.  (I think this is usually
optional, but you couldn't know whether it's turned on.)

#2 is probably the worst of these problems.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updatedtuple
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] On markers of changed data