Re: Time for an autoconf update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Time for an autoconf update
Date
Msg-id 51153670.6070308@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Time for an autoconf update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Time for an autoconf update
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/08/2013 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64,
> which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
>
> We are behind the curve.
>
>             


Is there any good reason not to move to whatever the latest and greatest 
is? 2.69 does seem pretty new - even Fedora 17 only comes with 2.68.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Time for an autoconf update
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Identity projection