Re: assessing parallel-safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: assessing parallel-safety
Date
Msg-id 5115.1426532127@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: assessing parallel-safety  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: assessing parallel-safety  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there a reason not to make a rule that opclass members must be
> parallel-safe?  I ask because I think it's important that the process
> of planning a query be categorically parallel-safe.

I'm not seeing the connection between those two statements.  The planner
doesn't usually execute opclass members, at least not as such.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Igrishin
Date:
Subject: Re: How to create shared_ptr for PGconn?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: assessing parallel-safety