Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date
Msg-id 5112CE15.4060909@joh.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/02/2013 22:25, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Mind you, when I explained our current CF review workflow for the SF
> ReviewFest last year, the attendees thought I was insane. It's kept me
> from doing more reviewfests. Our current workflow and tooling is
> definitely a serious obstacle to gettng more reviewers.  Seems like a
> good topic for the developer meeting.

I'm honestly having a hard time believing this.  I've never thought of 
the commitfest workflow as complicated or burdensome.  I actually quite 
like how things are there at the moment.

Besides, if we can't expect people to spend 30 minutes figuring out the 
workflow, how on earth do we expect them to review patches?


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs