<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/02/13 13:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:<br /></div><blockquote
cite="mid:510B0BD2.4010000@dunslane.net"type="cite"><br /> On 01/31/2013 07:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: <br
/><blockquotetype="cite">On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:andrew@dunslane.net"><andrew@dunslane.net></a>wrote: <br /><br /><blockquote type="cite">I'm happy
totake opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others have
toldme. Mostly they love the operators. <br /><br /> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->'
and'->>'. <br /></blockquote> Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts (where the
fontmakersthough of it as a kind of superscript character). <br /><br /> I suppose that := is out of the question? <br
/><br/></blockquote><br /><br /> Even if it were I would not on any account use it. As an old Ada programmer my mind
justrevolts at the idea of using this for anything but assignment. <br /><br /> cheers <br /><br /> andrew <br /><br
/><br/></blockquote><font size="-1">Ancient Al<font size="-1">gol 60 programmer here, otherwise ditto!</font></font><br
/>
