Re: json api WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: json api WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 510AEE1D.6090608@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: json api WIP patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: json api WIP patch  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Re: json api WIP patch  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Re: json api WIP patch  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/31/2013 05:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/10/13 6:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> This updated patch contains all the intended functionality, including
>> operators for the json_get_path functions, so you can say things like
>>
>>      select jsonval->array['f1','0','f2] ...
> I would like to not create any -> operators, so that that syntax could
> be used in the future for method invocation or something similar (it's
> in the SQL standard).


This is the first time I have heard that we should stay away from this. 
We have operators with this name in hstore, which is why I chose it.

Have we officially deprecated '->'? I know we deprecated "=>", but I 
simply don't recall anything about '->'.

>
> I also don't find the proposed use to be very intuitive.  You invented
> lots of other function names -- why not invent a few more for this
> purpose that are clearer?
>
>


I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some bikeshedding, 
but your reaction is contrary to everything others have told me. Mostly 
they love the operators.

I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.


cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Next
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: backend hangs at immediate shutdown (Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks)