Home > mailing lists

Re: plpgsql versus SPI plan abstraction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Jan Urbański
Subject	Re: plpgsql versus SPI plan abstraction
Date	January 31, 2013 00:55:10
Msg-id	510996B8.2080803@wulczer.org Whole thread Raw
In response to	plpgsql versus SPI plan abstraction (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On 30/01/13 22:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I'm also wondering if it's really necessary for plpython/plpy_spi.c
> to be looking into spi_priv.h ...

As far as I can tell, it's not necessary, spi.h would be perfectly fine.

Cheers,
Jan

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Bruce Momjian
Date: 31 January 2013, 00:35:20
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

From: Christopher Browne
Date: 31 January 2013, 01:37:40
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

Re: plpgsql versus SPI plan abstraction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next