Re: pg_ctl idempotent option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date
Msg-id 5108AAA1.7030109@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl idempotent option  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
List pgsql-hackers
>>> I don't think I like --force because it isn't clear if we are forcing
>>> the start to have done something, or forcing the server to be running.
> 
> Do we need this idempotent feature for "stop" too?

Yes, of course.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: passing diff options to pg_regress
Next
From: Alexander Law
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console