Re: SQL:2011 application time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date
Msg-id 50a1d589-4502-459f-8ce7-4e666684f87e@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL:2011 application time  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 29.01.25 07:34, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> Is it possible to commit an RI_PLAN_NO_ACTION addition and see if that 
> makes the buildfarm failures go away? Here is a proposed patch for that 
> (v48.1). I would understand if this is too questionable a practice---but 
> it would be nice to get sufficient test exposure to see if it makes a 
> difference. Since I still haven't reproduced this locally (despite 
> running continuously for almost a week), it's not an experiment I can do 
> myself. If it *does* make the failures go away, then it suggests there 
> is still some latent problem somewhere.

I'm tempted to give this a try.  But the cfbot is currently in a bit of 
a mess, so I'll wait until that is clean again so that we can have a 
usable baseline to work against.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unnecessary static specifier
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Failed assertion with jit enabled