Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Date
Msg-id 50FD8EE9.3090106@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
List pgsql-hackers
> IMHO that's the single most important task of a review.

Really?  I'd say the most important task for a review is "does the patch
do what it says it does?".  That is, if the patch is supposed to
implement feature X, does it actually?  If it's a performance patch,
does performance actually improve?

If the patch doesn't implement what it's supposed to, who cares what the
code looks like?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] PQping Docs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)