On 17.1.2013 20:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> I'm curious -- why would you drop tables in groups of 100 instead of
> just doing the 100,000 in a single transaction? Maybe that's faster
> now, because you'd do a single scan of the buffer pool instead of 1000?
> (I'm assuming that "in groups of" means you do each group in a separate
> transaction)
There's a limited number of locks, and each DROP acquires a lock
(possibly more than one).
Tomas
