Re: Materialized views WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date
Msg-id 50F6FB87.7040405@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Do we really need unlogged MVs in the first iteration?  Seems like
> that's adding a whole bunch of new issues, when you have quite enough
> already without that.

While I think there is strong user demand for unlogged MVs, if we can
get MVs without unlogged ones for 9.3, I say go for that.  We'll add
unlogged in 9.4.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Split out xlog reading into its own module called xlogreader