Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
Date | |
Msg-id | 50F6AE76.7040007@cybertec.at Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
2013-01-16 14:18 keltezéssel, Abhijit Menon-Sen írta: > At 2013-01-16 13:08:27 +0100, magnus@hagander.net wrote: >> One start might be to actually start having commitfest managers. > (I'm skipping over this point, since Craig's nomination as CF manager is > being discussed elsewhere in this thread.) > >> As in it technical works, but it's better to do it in a different way. >> I'm not sure how to catch those better. > It may be best to return the patch with feedback in that case (i.e. fail > fast) rather than fix the problem. With some advice about the right way > to do things, the original author or someone else can do the remaining > work before a committer looks at it again. If that works, then everyone > involved will have a better idea of where each patch stands, rather than > having the opaque backlog we do now. > > In the best case, more people can get some hands-on experience in what > it takes to prepare properly committable patches, and thus improve any > reviews they do in future. I can only speak for myself, but I would be > happy to help polish up patches like this. > > I don't know if this will help (and I haven't checked to see if it's > been discussed before), but perhaps it's worth trying? Right now there > seems to be very little else we non-committers can do to help directly. > > Aside: I thought about importing all CF patches into separate branches > in one git repository, so that one doesn't have to play hunt-the-wumpus > to find the latest version of a patch, and it's easier to submit small > fixes, easier to reject or fix patches that don't apply, easier to fix > whitespace errors once and for all (or even run pg_indent), etc. If any > committers think it would be helpful, please let me know. > >> We also talked about the one-patch-one-review. Did someone ever check >> if that worked out - did we get that spread, or did we end up with the >> same ratio as last time? > Here's a breakdown based purely on the names from the CF page (i.e. I > didn't check archives to see who actually posted reviews, and didn't > take into account reviews posted without updating the CF page). > > First, authors: > > 1 Abhijit Menon-Sen > 1 Alexander Korotkov, Oleg Bartunov > 1 Alexander Lakhin > 1 Amit Kapila, Hari Babu > 1 Asif Rehman > 1 Atri Sharma > 1 cjk > 1 Dean Rasheed > 1 Etsuro Fujita > 1 Greg Smith > 1 Heikki Linnakangas > 1 Jameison Martin > 1 Jan Wieck > 1 Jeff Janes > 1 Jeremy Evans > 1 Joachim Wieland > 1 Josh Kupershmidt > 1 Kevin Grittner > 1 Kyotaro Horiguichi > 1 Lars Kanis > 1 Marko Tiikkaja, Joel Jacobson > 1 Oskari Saarenmaa > 1 Phil Sorber > 1 Robert Haas > 1 Satoshi Nagayasu > 1 Vik Reykja > 1 Will Leinweber > 2 Álvaro Herrera > 2 Andres Freund > 2 Fujii Masao > 2 Kyotaro Horiguchi > 2 Peter Eisentraut > 3 Amit Kapila > 3 Dimitri Fontaine > 3 Pavel Stehule > 3 Tomas Vondra > 3 Zoltán Böszörményi It should be 2 submitted patches. The PQconninfo() was a subfeature of the pg_basebackup patch, Magnus added it to the commitfest separately. > 7 Alexander Korotkov > 13 Karl O. Pinc > > Second, reviewers: > > 1 Alastair Turner > 1 Ali Dar > 1 Amit Khandekar > 1 Andrew Dunstan > 1 Asif Rehman > 1 Dimitri Fontaine > 1 Etsuro Fujita > 1 Hari Babu > 1 Heikki Linnakangas > 1 Ibrar Ahmed > 1 Jeevan Chalke > 1 Josh Berkus > 1 Josh Kupershmidt > 1 KaiGai Kohei > 1 Kevin Grittner > 1 Kyotaro Horiguchi > 1 Magnus Hagander > 1 Michael Paquier > 1 Muhammad Usama > 1 Piyush Newe > 1 Simon Riggs > 1 Vik Reykja > 1 Zoltán Böszörményi I reviewed 2 patches: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1005 https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1006 > 2 Abhijit Menon-Sen > 2 Andres Freund > 2 Fujii Masao > 2 Karl O. Pinc > 2 Marko Tiikkaja > 2 Noah Misch > 2 Shigeru Hanada > 2 Tom Lane > 3 Peter Geoghegan > 3 Tomas Vondra > 4 Jeff Davis > 4 Pavel Stehule > 4 Robert Haas > 6 Amit Kapila > 9 Peter Eisentraut > 10 Nobody > > I haven't looked too carefully, but it seems to me that the people who > reviewed patches reviewed more than the number they submitted, but also > many people didn't review anything. > > -- Abhijit > > -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
pgsql-hackers by date: