On 01/11/2013 03:00 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> Jonathan,
>
>> The second has to do with the language on the bottom of the page discussing the
>> sponsorship levels and selection process. I reworded the sentences to more
>> clearly state the purpose of the sponsorship levels are and how they are
>> selected, maintaing a link to the guidelines on the wiki.
>
> Thank you for taking this on!
>
> Unfortunately, I think that your new wording is just as muddy as the
> previous wording. Can we use this instead?
>
> "Sponsorship levels are based on both duration and volume of code and
> non-code contributions to the project. The list of project sponsors
> every one to two years by the Sponsorship Committee<link>. If you find
> missing sponsors or inaccurate information on the sponsors list, please
> contact <mailto>"
You missed a word or two in there:
The list of project sponsors is reviewed approximately every years by
the Sponsorship Committee<link>.
>
> ... this will also require us to have a mailto address for people to
> contact.
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
