On 12/28/12 2:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> No, that's not what I mean. What I mean is that it seems questionable
> to want to do anything *within* an exception handler on the basis of
> where an exception was raised from.
Isn't that the whole point of this patch? The only purpose of this
feature is to make the exception information available in a
"machine-readable" way. That functionality has been requested many
times over the years.
