On 19.12.2012 17:27, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 19.12.2012 15:55, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 19.12.2012 04:57, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Heikki,
>>>
>>> I ran into an unexpected issue while testing. I just wanted to fire up
>>> a chain of 5 replicas to see if I could connect them in a loop.
>>> However, I ran into a weird issue when starting up "r3": it refused to
>>> come out of "the database is starting up" mode until I did a write on
>>> the master. Then it came up fine.
>>>
>>> master-->r1-->r2-->r3-->r4
>>>
>>> I tried doing the full replication sequence (basebackup, startup, test)
>>> with it twice and got the exact same results each time.
>>>
>>> This is very strange because I did not encounter the same issues with r2
>>> or r4. Nor have I seen this before in my tests.
>>
>> Ok.. I'm going to need some more details on how to reproduce this, I'm
>> not seeing that when I set up four standbys.
>
> Ok, I managed to reproduce this now.
Hmph, no I didn't, I replied to wrong email. The problem I managed to
reproduce was the one where you get "requested WAL
segment 000000020000000000000003 has already been removed" errors,
reported by Thom.
- Heikki
