2012-11-23 06:30 keltezéssel, Fujii Masao írta:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote:
>> 2012-11-22 12:44 keltezéssel, Magnus Hagander írta:
>>>>>>>> Also, a question was buried in the other review which is - are we OK
>>>>>>>> to remove the requiressl parameter. Both these patches do so, because
>>>>>>>> the code becomes much simpler if we can do that. It has been
>>>>>>>> deprecated since 7.2. Is it OK to remove it, or do we need to put
>>>>>>>> back
>>>>>>>> in the more complex code to deal with both?
>>>>>> Just going to highlight that we're looking for at least one third
>>>>>> party to comment on this :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, me too. A +1 for removing wouldn't count from me. ;-)
> +1
Thanks. :-)
>
>> The second one is the product of what caught my attention while
>> I was looking at pg_receivexlog. The current coding may write
>> beyond the end of the allocated arrays and the password may
>> overwrite a previously set keyword/value pair.
> ISTM that such problem doesn't happen at all because argcount is
> incremented as follows.
>
> if (dbhost)
> argcount++;
> if (dbuser)
> argcount++;
> if (dbport)
> argcount++;
Right, forget about the second patch.
>
> Regards,
>
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
