Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
Subject Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?
Date
Msg-id 50A8E1F8D9122546A7F67134915EDB7A3B8E4E@xmb-rtp-21a.amer.cisco.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I see.  Perhaps earlier I alienated some people by talking about
transactions per second, which is not necessarily an appropriate unit.

Thanks for the tip.

-Will


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marlowe@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2009 16:08
To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is there a meaningful benchmark?

This is one of those areas where postgresql acts very differently from
other dbs.  In lots of other dbs big transactions are the performance
killer.  In PostgreSQL big transactions are the way to get better
performace.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?