Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Swan
Subject Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Date
Msg-id 50957.199.222.14.2.1080248465.squirrel@www.idigx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)  (Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
<quote who="Dustin Sallings">
>
> On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote:
>
>> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the
>> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone
>> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it.
>
>     I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well
> supported on Windows as postgres is.
>

It that like the best beach volleball player in Antarctica?  The Windows
port of Postgresql is still in its infancy.  It's coming along, but its
not a finished product.


>     The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares
> could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys
> are interested in making.  I've seen such discussions on the list.
>
> --
> Dustin Sallings
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Next
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Per database users/admins, handy for database virtual hosting...