Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc
Date
Msg-id 5092.939423664@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc  ("Pedro J. Lobo" <pjlobo@euitt.upm.es>)
List pgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> New code in Makefile.alpha is:

>     /* some platforms define __alpha, but not __alpha__ */
>     #if defined(__alpha) && !defined(__alpha__)
>     #define __alpha__
>     #endif

OK, so we're going to standardize on __alpha__ to recognize that
platform?  OK by me, unless the Alpha users know a reason not to.

But the above doesn't belong in Makefile.alpha does it?  I'd have
thought include/port/alpha.h, since __alpha__ is being looked for
by C code not makefiles.

BTW, a quick glimpse shows no occurrences of __alpha except in
contrib/int8/int8.c, which is presumably unmaintained dead code now
that int8 is in the mainstream.  Shouldn't we delete contrib/int8
entirely?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc