On 10/19/2012 04:26 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Hmm. Maybe we should think of implementing this as REMOTE TABLE, that
>> is a table which gets no real data stored locally but all insert got through
>> WAL
>> and are replayed as real inserts on slave side.
> FWIW, MySQL calls this exact concept the "black hole" storage engine.
In this case calling this WRITE ONLY TABLE does not seem so strange
anymore :)
Or even PERSISTENT WRITE ONLY TABLE to make the paradox more explicit.
>
> Regards,
> Ants Aasma
