On 10/15/2012 04:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> PS. I'd love to see a basic Slony plugin for this, for example, to see how
>> >much extra code on top of the posted patches you need to write in a plugin
>> >like that to make it functional. I'm worried that it's a lot..
> I agree. I would go so far as to say that if Slony can't integrate
> with this work and use it in place of their existing change-capture
> facility, that's sufficient grounds for unconditional rejection.
The fact that current work starts with "apply cache" instead of streaming
makes the semantics very close to how londiste and slony do this.
Therefore I don't think there will be any problems with "can't" though
it may be
that there will be nobody actually doing it, at least not before January.
------------
Hannu
