Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Hansen
Subject Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Date
Msg-id 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A939D@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG Killed by OOM Condition  ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane Wrote:

> (a) wouldn't that require root privilege?  (b) how would we
> determine whether we are on a system to which this applies?
> (c) is it actually documented in a way that makes you think
> it'll be a permanently supported feature (ie, somewhere
> outside the source code)?

(a) No, /proc/{pid}/* is owned by the process
(b) /proc/{pid}/oom_adj exists ?
(c) No, from the source: (not docbooked, we don't want this one
cluttering up the manual)

... John


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GUNDUZ
Date:
Subject: Re: RPMs for RedHat ES3.0
Next
From: "John Hansen"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition