On 09/22/2012 01:57 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Below is the patch that I mentioned at pgOpen. I'm pretty sure my
> silly github pull request got screwed up anyway, so probably best to
> ignore it. Regardless, please let me know what you think. I'd be
> happy to rework it to operate off of a single hash, though I think
> that would require having 'one true hash' of all possible steps and
> it kind of looked like you were trying to avoid that.
I'm not sure it's a great advance, but I'll take a look. In any case
please sent it as a proper MIME attachment. It did not come through
clean. Alternatively, and probably better, put this on a topic branch
that I can git-fetch (that's recommended practice for github pull
requests too).
cheers
andrew
