Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Date
Msg-id 505D39B5.6040203@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT  ("David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
List pgsql-general
On 09/21/12 7:43 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> Has there been any discussion regarding adding a time-limited version
> of NOWAIT, say: “WAITONLY 50” (milliseconds), when dealing the
> explicit LOCK TABLE or the SELECT…FOR(SHARE|UPDATE) commands?

is this a feature in any other major databases?

is this in the sql spec?


what do you expect to happen if these timeouts expire? return an error,
and abort the transaction?


--
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Next
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Question about upgrading extensions