Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Date
Msg-id 5056.979851224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems  (Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>)
Responses Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems  (Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com>)
List pgsql-ports
Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes:
>> The fixed-size-array thing sounds like a gotcha waiting to bite someone.

> Agreed.

>> How big is the array, anyway?

> The current size is 100 deep.  Is that sufficient for PostgreSQL or is
> this dependent on usage?

Mumble.  I'd sure you could gin up a scenario where it fails, but
deleting 100 recently-used tables in one transaction doesn't seem like a
very likely situation.

Probably a more interesting question to ask is how graceful is the
behavior when that array fills up?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Next
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems