Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate
Date
Msg-id 5055DE3D.4040603@ringerc.id.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
Responses Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate
List pgsql-performance
On 09/16/2012 09:45 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:

This seems under-documented and I haven't found much good info on it, so the best thing to do is test it.

Found it, it's in the NOTES for CREATE TABLE.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-createtable.html:

When a UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY constraint is not deferrable, PostgreSQL checks for uniqueness immediately whenever a row is inserted or modified. The SQL standard says that uniqueness should be enforced only at the end of the statement; this makes a difference when, for example, a single command updates multiple key values. To obtain standard-compliant behavior, declare the constraint as DEFERRABLE but not deferred (i.e., INITIALLY IMMEDIATE). Be aware that this can be significantly slower than immediate uniqueness checking.


--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate