oh, duh.. works now... Thanks for the second pair of eyes.
I thought I had ruled that out by doing a search on the type name and making sure it was the same all places... (which is a long ingrained habit). Must have searched on one of the other type names.
This is my first use of such a type in a postgres table, thought it was something I didn't understand yet.
On Thursday, December 24, 2020, 12:25:29 PM EST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: