On 9/13/12 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> A probably less costly solution than marking current_call_data volatile
>> is just to make it not-static.
>
> And on still further investigation, the patch I just applied to HEAD
> seems to make it go away too. Bizarre as can be. If that holds up for
> you, I think back-patching that change is less ugly than making the
> variable non-static.
It does, indeed. I can't reproduce the bug on my end with that patch
applied.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
