Re: build farm machine using mixed results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Date
Msg-id 504E36B6.2000008@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/10/2012 02:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> And the answer is ... it's a gmake bug.  Apparently introduced in 3.82.
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30653
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835424
>> So I think .NOTPARALLEL is just masking the true problem, but
>> nonetheless it's a problem.  And given that the bug report on savannah
>> has been ignored for two years, we should not hold our breath for a fix
>> to appear upstream (much less propagate to everyone using 3.82).
> So no sooner do I complain about that, than the upstream maintainers
> wake up and commit it:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2012-09/msg00016.html
>
> No idea when a fixed release might appear, but at least somebody who
> knows the gmake code has signed off on the fix now.
>
>             

When it does appear in a release I guess we could make the .NOTPARALLEL 
conditional on make version. If not, we'll have to wait a long time 
before removing it.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol