Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning
Date
Msg-id 504D3CA9.7050001@catalyst.net.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
>> Postgres are the following:
>>
>> Parallel execution of queries.
>>
>> No Table Partitioning
>
> Not a bug, so off-topic for this list.  If you need help figuring
> out how best to use PostgreSQL, or whether it is a good fit for
> your use-case, a post to pgsql-novice@postgresql.org would be more
> appropriate.
>
>

Or even -hackers - but it would make sense to ask 2 questions along the
lines of:

1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone working
on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance?

2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution?

Regards


Mark

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7516: PL/Perl crash
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning