Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id 504941.1648704317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> There's still about a third of the buildfarm running older
> client releases --- I count

>       2 REL_8
>       2 REL_10
>      13 REL_11
>       6 REL_12
>      16 REL_13.1
>      89 REL_14

Wait a minute ... actually, what's most relevant here is
the population running TAP tests, which seems to be

      2 REL_8
      4 REL_11
      1 REL_12
      7 REL_13.1
     53 REL_14

So there are still some people we'd have to nag if it doesn't
work pre-v14, but fewer than I thought --- specifically,
the owners of

butterflyfish
copperhead
eelpout
elver
halibut
kittiwake
mantid
marabou
massasauga
myna
snakefly
snapper
spurfowl
tadarida

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set