Re: bug of pg_trgm? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: bug of pg_trgm?
Date
Msg-id 50491488.5090605@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug of pg_trgm?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/06/2012 05:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 08/20/2012 01:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> OK. Attached patch fixes the problem as you suggested, i.e., it backs up
>>>> "endword" if the second loop exits in an escape pair.
>>> Applied with a bit of further adjustment of the comments.  Thanks!
>> When moving to a release with this change, will users need to reindex
>> trgm indexes?
> No.  This only changes extraction of search trigrams from a LIKE pattern,
> not extraction of trigrams from text to be indexed.
>
>             

OK, Thanks.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of pg_trgm?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: improving python3 regression test setup