On 09/03/2012 04:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that we can't pass these
> parameters through the regular libpq connection string mechanism, and
> will have to invent something else. That's awfully nasty though;
> it will pretty much cripple the idea that this would be a simple way to
> invoke a quasi-embedded variant of Postgres.
>
>
That would be a bit sad. BTW, how would this work for things like
auto_vacuum, logging_collector and so on?
cheers
andrew
