Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement
Date
Msg-id 5040E4BC.10904@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/31/2012 10:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2012 11:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> Again, win32 testing would be welcome.  Sadly, buildfarm does not run
>> pg_upgrade's "make check".
>
>
>
> Yesterday I added a new module to the buildfarm client code to run 
> this 
> (<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/ab812cb9920c65e39ec7358dc816371f1fef31eb>). 
> It required a couple of tweaks in the base code. This will be in a new 
> buildfarm client release fairly shortly. It's running on crake now, 
> and I will add it to pitta to get some Windows coverage.
>

but it's not working on pitta :-(

It will take me some time to work out why, and I have several more 
urgent things on my plate. Meanwhile at least we have Linux coverage.

cheers

andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch